Tuesday, November 12, 2013

The Olympics and Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Part II

In our last installment we discussed the bureaucratic barriers to Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu’s inclusion in the Olympic Games. Today, we’ll be looking at a few of the loopholes around those barriers.

In 2002, the IOC, passed a resolution limiting the number of sports in the Summer Olympic program to 28. Of those 28 spots, 25 are reserved for core sports. The remaining three spots are non-core sports and are changeable. The three current non-core sports are; Wrestling, Golf, and Rugby. Regardless of the year, it seems unlikely that the IOC would vote in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu over one of these other sports.

If you are familiar or active in the worldwide grappling community you may remember the uproar when Wrestling was dropped from the Olympic program. Wrestling probably won’t be dropped for several Olympics, and certainly not for another grappling sport with less niche-appeal.

It is further unlikely that Golf or Rugby would be dropped in favor of BJJ. Like Wrestling, Golf and Rugby have broader appeal. And while the IOC seems to have enjoy having a plethora of racket sports: Tennis, Table Tennis, and Badminton, there is no evidence to suggest that they would want another grappling sport.

However, there is a loophole. The Olympics allow multiple disciplines for a sport, if all those sports fall under the jurisdiction of the same international federation. Aquatics, run by FINA, is composed of Swimming, Diving, Synchronized Swimming, and Water Polo; Gymnastics, run by FIG, is composed of Artistic, Rhythmic, and Trampoline; Wrestling, run by FILA, is composed of Freestyle and Greco-Roman. This loophole affords us several unlikely options.

The best option, from a Jiu-Jiteiro’s position is the creation of an international federation for racket sports. The formation of a new IF for racket sports would fold Badminton, Table Tennis, and Tennis under its wings. It would also create two new core sport slots. However, this is also the least likely option to take place. Each of these sports has taken decades to reach the level of Olympic sport and would undoubtedly be against the combining of their three federations.

Another option is for the IOC and FILA to add Submission Wrestling to Wrestling. Of course, the governance of Submission Wrestling by FILA creates its own set of problems. We have no idea what FILA-sanctioned Submission Wrestling would look like. It probably would not resemble IBJJF Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. Neither Freestyle or Greco-Roman Wrestling use the gi. It may not even resemble No-Gi Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. It is much more likely that FILA Submission Wrestling would be akin to Catch Wrestling. Freestyle Wrestling has Catch roots. While this would undoubtedly thrill the Catch Wrestling aficionados, it would not satisfy the Jiu-Jiteiros.

Catch Wrestling, like nearly all other forms of grappling, places an emphasis on the top game. Like Freestyle and Greco-Roman, Catch matches can be won with a pin. Catch matches can also be won via submission. Joint locks are allowed in Catch, but strangleholds are not.

Another possible option, and one that could save the gi, is for Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu to join forces with Judo. But this would require the IBJJF and the IJF to reach an amicable settlement. Much like the aforementioned racket sports IF, the governing federations of both Judo and BJJ would have to decide to create a gi grappling federation. More importantly, and less likely, the Presidents and officers of each federation would have to be willing to step down and undergo a new election process. Again this forces Jiu-Jitsu players to confront the manipulation of their beloved sport.

Like FILA Submission Wrestling, we have no clue what Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu run, at least partly, by Judokas would look like. Nearly annually, the IJF changes the rules of Judo. First, it was banning pick-ups and leg-grabs (techniques similar to Single- and Double-Legs in Wrestling). Then it was placing time limits on particularly dominant grips (belt grips or over the shoulder grips may only be held for three seconds) or outlawing them outright (Judo practitioners are now only allowed to grab their opponents pants to counter a throw). Now, Judokas are no longer permitted to use a two-on-one grip break (that is to say that they can’t use two hands to break a grip). Personally, I would rather have Jiu-Jitsu stay out of the Olympics than be bastardized in the way that Judo has been by the IJF, but this is solely my opinion.

As in our previous post about Olympic Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, it becomes clear that BJJ’s addition to the Olympic program is a long way off. More importantly, if Jiu-Jitsu does become an Olympic sport, it may not be the sport we want it to be.

Friday, November 8, 2013

The Olympics and Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu

Fans of submission grappling have been clamoring for Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu to be included in the Olympic program for years. With the 2016 Olympics taking place in Rio de Janeiro, the noise has reached ear-shattering levels. But should BJJ be included in the Olympics? Possibly. Will BJJ be included in the Olympics? No. At least not any time soon.

The list of requirements just to qualify for Olympic consideration are extensive and exhaustive. It’s easy to underestimate how difficult it is for a sport to be selected for the Olympic program because Badminton, Table Tennis, and Trampoline are currently Olympic sports. But it took those sports decades to reach Olympic eligibility.

An Olympic sport must be contested in 75 countries, for men, and 50 countries, for women, across four continents. A cursory search on Google and YouTube suggests that Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu meets the 75 country requirement, and the IBJJF already holds tournaments in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia.

However, it is not enough for sporting events to be held in 75 countries. A sport must be “widely practiced.” This means that a sport must have a national federation. These national federations must also have an international governing body. The International Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Federation (IBJJF) was formed in 2002, and though they are making great strides towards creating national federations (Brazil, France, Portugal, and the USA among others), there are nowhere near 75 national Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu federations. Luckily for fans of Jiu-Jitsu this seems like a problem that will naturally solve itself over time as BJJ continues to grow in worldwide popularity. However, as Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu expands and becomes more inclusive, the Olympics are contracting and becoming more exclusive.

In 2002, the International Olympic Committee passed a resolution limiting the sports in the Summer Olympics to a maximum of 28. Twenty-five of the 28 spots are reserved for “core sports” and the remaining three slots are subject to vote. The current “non-core sports” included are: Wrestling, Golf, and Rugby Sevens.

The Olympic Charter requires a sport to be voted in at least seven years prior to the Olympic Games that is to be contested. Golf and Rugby were voted into the 2016 Olympics in 2009. Wrestling was dropped from the 2020 Olympic Program in 2012, and restored to it in 2013. The earliest Olympics that Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu could be included is in 2024. However, that relies on one of the previous three sports being dropped in 2017.

Given the furor over Wrestling being dropped in 2012, it’s unlikely the IOC would consider dropping the sport again in 2024. Golf and Rugby, just voted in, are probably not going to be dropped for 2024 (since 2013 is almost over they can’t be dropped for the 2020 Olympics). That pushes Olympic Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu to 2028 or later.

The possibility of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu being considered for the Olympics is awesome. The probability of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu being considered for the Olympics is awful. There are simply too many barriers in its way. Next week, we will look at possible loopholes around said barriers. In the meantime, what are your thoughts on the likelihood of Jiu-Jitsu being at the Olympics?